Nato’s Securitization Process as Identity Formation and Cultural System

Main Article Content

Giovanni Ercolani

Abstract

This paper gazes at the recent US Army and NATO operation ‘Dragoon Ride’ (20 March – 1 April 2015) which was performed in response to Russia’s actions in Ukraine (March 2014). It argues that the aim of this military exercise, which has been fabricated and staged as a security ritual, is to interpellate the NATO citizen. However, this security ritual is to be understood inside the transformational process which NATO has initiated after the implosion of the Soviet Union in order to survive in the new global insecurity environment as a power-knowledge-security structure. At the end the paper shows that NATO while it is developing a ‘comprehensive’ securitization discourse in which the existential threat is not only a non-military threat, at the end it plays the same Cold War emotional card of a Russian military attack to NATO’s nations.

Article Details

How to Cite
ERCOLANI, Giovanni. Nato’s Securitization Process as Identity Formation and Cultural System. Култура/Culture, [S.l.], v. 6, n. 13, p. 20-31, nov. 2016. ISSN 1857-7725. Available at: <http://journals.cultcenter.net/index.php/culture/article/view/240>. Date accessed: 22 nov. 2017.
Section
English Articles

References

[1] Adorno, Theodor W. (2007), The Culture Industry – Selected essays on mass culture, London and New York: Routledge.
[2] Agamben, Giorgio (2005), State of Exception, Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.
[3] Althusser, Louis (1988), Ideologia Y aparatos ideológicos de Estado, Buenos Aires: Ediciones Nueva Vision.
[4] Anderson, Benedict (2006), Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism, London: Verso.
[5] Barthes, R. (2000), Mythologies, London: Vintage Books.
[6] Benjamin, Walter (1970), Illuminations, Bungay, Suffolk: Fontana.
[7] Bloch, Marc (1989), I re taumaturghi, Torino: Giulio Einaudi editore s.p.a.
[8] Booth, K. and Wheeler N. J. (2008), The Security Dilemma: Fear, Cooperation and Trust in World Politics, New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
[9] Bourdieu, Pierre (2005), Language & Symbolic power, edited by John B. Thompson, Cambridge: Polity Press.
[10] Buzan, Barry, Waever, O., and de Wilde, J. (1998), Security: A New Framework for Analysis, London: Lynne Rienner Publishers.
[11] Campacci, Davide (2009), Il concetto di sicurezza nel mondo romano: spunti di riflessione, paper not published.
[12] Canetti, Elias (1972), Massa e potere, Milano: Rizzoli.
[13] Cobley, Paul (2006), Narrative, London and New York: Routledge.
[14] Durkheim, Emile (2001), The Elementary Forms of Religious Life, Oxford University Press.
[15] Eco, Umberto (2006), Lector in Fabula: la cooperazione interpretativa nei testi narrativi, Milano: Tascabili Bompiani.
[16] Elkana, Yehuda (1981), ‘A Programmatic Attempt at an Anthropology of Knowledge’ in Mendelsohn, Everett; Elkana, Yehuda, Sciences and Cultures: anthropological and historical studies of the sciences, Volume 5, Dordrecht: Reidel Publishing Company.
[17] Ercolani, Giovanni (2011), ‘Keeping Security and Peace: Behind the Strategicalization of NATO’s Critical Security Discourse’, The Journal of Security Strategies, Year 7, Issue 14.
[18] Fierke, K. M. (2007), Critical Approaches to International Security, Cambridge: Polity.
[19] Foucault, Michel (1980), Power/Knowledge – Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972-1977, edited by Colin Gordon, New York: Pantheon Books.
[20] Foucault, Michel (1991), Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison, London: Penguin Books.
[21] Galimberti, Umberto (2011), Psiche e techne – L’uomo nell’eta’ della tecnica, Milano: Feltrinelli.
[22] Geertz, Clifford (1973), The Interpretation of Cultures: Selected Essays, New York: Basic Books.
[23] Gentile, Emilio (2007), Le Religioni della politica. Fra democrazie e totalitarismi, Bari: Editori Laterza.
[24] Huysmans, Jef (2006), The Politics of Insecurity: Fear, Migration and Asylum in the EU, London and New York: Routledge.
[25] Inglis D. and Hughson J. (eds.) (2005), The Sociology of Art – Ways of Seeing, New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
[26] Lukes, S. (2005), Power – A Radical View, New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
[27] Lupia, A. and McCubbins, M. D. (1998), The democratic dilemma: Can citizens learn what they need to know?, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
[28] Marcuse, H. (1991), One-Dimensional Man: Studies in the ideology of advanced industrial society, New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
[29] Neumann, Iver B. (2009), ‘Discourse Analysis’, in Klotz, Audie & Prakash, Deepa (eds), Qualitative Methods in International Relations: A Pluralist Guide, New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 61-77.
[30] Orwell, George (2000), Nineteen Eighty-Four, London: Penguin Books.
[31] Ranciere, J. (2014), The Politics of Aesthetics – The Distribution of the Sensible, London: Bloomsbury Academic.
[32] Schechner, Richard (2003), Performance Theory, New York and London: Routledge.
[33] Searle, John R. (1996), The Construction of Social Reality, London: Penguin Books.
[34] Said, Edward W. (2003) [1978], Orientalism, London: Penguin Books.
[35] Soligan, J. (2009), ‘The Transformation of Defence: NATO Perspectives’”, in Sait Yilmaz (ed), The National Defense in the 21st Century, Istanbul: Beykent University, 351-358.
[36] Volkan, Vamik (2004), Blind Trust: Large Groups and Their Leaders in Times of Crisis and Terro, Charlottesville, Virginia: Pitchstone Publishing.
[37] Walton, Kendall L. (1990), Mimesis as Make Believe – On the Foundation of the Representational Arts, Cambridge, Massachusetts, and London, England: Harvard University Press.
[38] Williams, Michael C. (2007), Culture and Security: Symbolic Power and the politics of International Relations, London and New York: Routledge.
[39] Zizek, Slavoj (2008), The Sublime Object of Ideology, London – New York: Verso.