Counter-Monument: Artivism Against Official Memory Practices

Main Article Content

Milena Dragićević Šešić

Abstract

This paper will explore ways of dissent regarding policies of memorialization of Yugoslavia, its common past and recent wars. It will show the difficulties for the development of official memory policies that are not resulting in coherent practices of remembrance in Croatia, Serbia, Montenegro, Macedonia, and in Bosnia and Herzegovina. These questions are not debated in public and an explicit memory policy does not exist anywhere in the Balkans due to changing ideologies during transition and numerous old and new taboos around the negative past. There is no social consensus on any of the crucial issues of remembrance (while temporary social consensus during the war years was based only on fear and hatred toward the other). The key theme of this paper is linked to counter-monuments and anti-monuments as bottom-up expressions of the feelings of dissent toward official (implicit and explicit) memory and monument policies. Social oppositional counter movements have often inspired different attempts by artists and civil society (that often go together) to react and offer their visions and options of memory and commemorative politics, particularly regarding taboos and the negative past.. Exploring the work of Jochen Gerz in Europe, its impact in the region as well as regional counter-monument projects and initiatives, this paper will try to respond to the following question: have alternative socio-cultural movements produced a platform for genuine counter-monument practices?

Article Details

How to Cite
DRAGIĆEVIĆ ŠEŠIĆ, Milena. Counter-Monument: Artivism Against Official Memory Practices. Култура/Culture, [S.l.], v. 6, n. 13, p. 7-19, nov. 2016. ISSN 1857-7725. Available at: <http://journals.cultcenter.net/index.php/culture/article/view/239>. Date accessed: 22 nov. 2017.
Section
English Articles

References

[1] Armstrong, John, (1982) Nations Before Nationalism Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
[2] Assmann, Alaida (2006) Der lange Schatten der Vergangenheit. Erinnerungskultur und Geschichtspolitik, Munich: C.H. Beck.
[3] Assmann, Jan (1995) Collective Memory and Cultural Identity. New German Critique 6 (spring/summer), 125-133.
[4] Assmann, Jan (2001) Kultura pamćenja. Beograd: Prosveta.
[5] Assmann, Alaida (2012) Cultural Memory and Western Civilization, Cambridge: Cambridge University press.
[6] Bago I. & Majača A, eds. (2009) Publishers: DeLVe | Institute for Duration, Location and Variables; Galerija Miroslav Kraljević, Zagreb
[7] Bajić Mrdjan. http://www.mrdjanbajic.net/ accessed 2nd December, 2015.
[8] Blažević et al. (2008) De/Construction of monuments, Sarajevo: Centar za savremenu umjetnost
[9] Bodnar J. (1992) Remaking America: Public Memory, Commemoration, and Patriotism in the Twentieth Century,
[10] Bourdieu, P. (1998) Acts of Resistance, Against the Tyranny of the Market, New York: The New Press.
[11] Bulatović D. (2014) Heritage vs. Fetish, Kultura (Skopje), n. 8, pp. 33-42
[12] Connerton, Paul. How Societies Remember, Cambridge University press, 1989. Serbian edition: Kako društva pamte, Samizdat B92, Belgrade, 2002.
[13] Connerton, Paul (2008) "Seven types of forgetting", Memory Studies, vol. 1 no. 1, pp. 59-71.
[14] Dragićević Šešić, M. (2011). Cultural policies, identities and monument building in Southeastern Europe. In: Cultural Identity Politics in the (Post) Transitional societies. edited by Aldo Milohnić and Nada Švob-Đokić. Zagreb: IMO. pp. 31-46 ISBN 978-953-6096-56-5
[15] Dragićević Šešić, M. (2012) ‘Memory Policies and Monument Building in Southeastern Europe’, in: Memory of the city, ed. Dusica Dražić, Slavica Radišić & Marijana Simu, Kulturklamer, Beograd, ISBN 978-86-912137-2-5, PP.70-95
[16] Dragićević Šešić, Milena; Stefanović, Milena (2013) ‘How Theatres Remember: Cultures of Memory in Institutionalized Systems’, Kultura no. 4, Center for Cultural Memory, Skopje, pp.11-29.
[17] Dragićević Šešić i Milena Stefanović (2014), Trauma in institutional memory, Conference paper, ENCATC, Brno, September.
[18] Gerz J. http://www.jochengerz.eu/ accessed 2nd December, 2015
[19] Gerz J. 1994 Monument against Fascism Stuttgart: Hatje/Cantz.
[20] Georgievska Jakovleva, Loreta (2014) ‘The Projects Skopje 2014: Between Social Cohesion and Social Disintegration’, Culture No. 8/2014, pp. 43-56.
[21] Huyssen Andreas. ‘Present Pasts: Media, Politics, Amnesia’ (2001) in Globalization, special issue of Public Culture, (ed. A. Appadurai), Duke University Press.
[22] Komšić, Jovan (2015), Demokratsko upravljanje kulturološkim različitostima (Vojvodina u svetlu evropskih iskustava), Beograd: Dangraf
[23] Kuljić T. (2015) ‘Antispomenik’, Politika, 23. avgust
[24] Mecthild, Manus & Vickery Jonathan (2016) The Art of the Multitude: Jochen Gerz – Participation and the European Experience, Goethe Institute & Campus Verlag, Frankfurt
[25] Milohnić, A. (2005) Artivism. Maska, 20(1–2), 15–25.
[26] Nora, Pierre (1998), Realms of Modernity: the construction of the french past. Vol. 3, Symbols. New York: Columbia University Press.
[27] Tomić, Milica, http://milicatomic.wordpress.com/works /monumentdiscussion/, accessed 2nd December 2015
[28] Tunbridge J. E. and G. J. Ashworth. (1996) Dissonant heritage, the management of the past as a resource in conflict, J. Wiley in Chichester, New York.
[29] ‘Young J. The Counter-Monument: Memory against Itself in Germany Today’, in Critical Inquiry, Vol. 18. No 2 (Winter 1992). pp. 267-296.