Perception of Personal Characteristic and Importance of the Identity of Students in the Republic of Macedonia: Factors and Consequences

  • Eleonora Serafimovska University “Ss.Cyril and Methodius”, Skopje
  • Marijana Markovikj University “Ss.Cyril and Methodius”


This paper comes out from more extensive research named “Real and virtual identities” realized by Institute for sociological, political and juridical research during year 2013. Its tendency was to explore how young people see themselves, which attributes they use in process of self definition, as well as to find out what are the factors and outcomes of self definition process. This part of the research is actually in the field of psychology of personality and identity and it is based on the circumflex model of interpersonal behavior. The main hypothesis in this segment of the study assumed that certain socio-demographic factors influenced the identity perception of young people and that it has an impact in several segments of their socio-political life. Research sample size was 707 respondents, male 256 and 451 female students from Skopje, Tetovo and Bitola. When the factors are in focus, the data show that male, with a greater intensity than women perceive themselves as dominant, calculating, cold-blooded and introverted, while women with more intensity than men perceive themselves as cooperative; Albanians, in comparison with the Macedonians, in the description of self stress more: dominance, accountability, coldblooded, introvert, while the Macedonians, stress more: cooperation and sociability; respondents living in the village to a greater extent describe themselves as introverted, less dominant, compared to those living in the city. Those who live in the city, compared with those who live in the village over perceived themselves as social. Speaking about the outcomes, openness to different social events is usually connected positively with dimensions as gregariousness, willingness to cooperate and domination, and negatively to introversion and inferiority.


[1] Baumeister, Roy. Identity: Cultural Change and the Struggle for Self, Oxford: Oxford University Press, USA, 1986. Print.
[2] Edvard, Sampson E. “Personality and the location of identity”, Journal of Personality, Vol 46, 552-568, 1978. Web< http://onlinelibrary.
[3] Hatcher Robert L., & Rogers, Daniel T. “Development and validation of a measure of interpersonal strengths: The Inventory of Interpersonal Strengths”, Psychological Assessment, 21, 544-569, 2009. Print.
[4] Horowitz,Leonard M. Interpersonal foundations of psychopathology, Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, 2004. Print.
[5] Horowitz,Leonard M. Alden Lynn.E., Wiggins, Jerry.S. & Pincus A.L., Inventory of Interpersonal Problems Manual. Odessa, FL: The Psychological Corporation, 2000. Web< http://www.mindgarden. com/ 113-inventory-of-interpersonal-problems
[6] Kiesler, Donald J. Contemporary interpersonal theory and research: Personality, psychopathology and psychotherapy. New York, Wiley, 1996. Web<
[7] Kiesler, Donald J. Schmidt, James A., and Wagner Christopher, C.” A circumplex inventory of impact messages: An operational bridge between emotional and interpersonal behavior in R. Plutchik & H.R. Conte (eds)”, Circumplex models of personality and emotions (pp. 221–244). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, 1997. Print.
[8] Leary, Timothy Interpersonal diagnosis of personality, New York: Ronald Press, 1957. Print
[9] Locke, Kenneth D. “Circumplex Scales of Interpersonal Values: Reliability, validity, and applicability to interpersonal problems and personality disorders”, Journal of Personality Assessment, 75, 249–267, 2000. Web< 12303934_Circumplex_Scales_of_Interpersonal_Values_Reliability_Validity_and_Applicability_to_Interpersonal_Problems_and_Personality_Disorders
[10] Maleska, Mirjana. „Multiethnic democracy in Macedonia: political analysis and emerging scenarios“, New Balkan Politics, 13, 1-27, 2013.
[11] Nikolić, Milan. i dr. Mladi zagubljeni u tranzicii, Beograd: Centar za proučavanje alternative, 2004. Web [12] Trapnell, Paul.D. and Wiggins, John.S. “Extension of the Interpersonal Adjective Scales to Include the Big Five Dimensions of Personality”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 59 (4) October, 781-790, 1990. Web< reprints/1990_TrapnellWiggins_ExtensionofIAStoBigFive.htm
[13] Tajfel,Henri,Turner, John C. “The social identity theory of inter-group behaviour”, in S. Worchel and L. W. Austin (eds), Psychology of Intergroup Relations. Chigago: Nelson-Hall, 1986. Print.
[14] Такашманова, Tатијана Когнитивниот развој и сликата за себе во периодот на адолесценција, Скопје: Графохартија, 1998. Print
[15] Weinreich, Peter, Sounderson, Wendy. Analysing Identity: Cross-Cultural, Societal and Clinical Contexts, London: Routledge, 2003. Web<,_Societal_and_Clinical_Contexts_by_Peter_Weinreich_and_Wendy_Saunderson.asp
16] Wiggins, Јerry С. “An informal history of the interpersonal circumplex tradition”, Journal of Personality Assessment, 66, 217-233, 1996. Print.
[17] Христова, Лидија Серафимовска, Елеонора Марковиќ, Маријана Цекиќ, Анета Перцепција на идентитетите на студентската популација во Република Македонија, Скопје: Универзитет Св Кирил и Методиј, Институт за социолошки и политичко-правни истражувања-Скопје, 2014. Print.
How to Cite
SERAFIMOVSKA, Eleonora; MARKOVIKJ, Marijana. Perception of Personal Characteristic and Importance of the Identity of Students in the Republic of Macedonia: Factors and Consequences. Култура/Culture, [S.l.], v. 6, n. 13, p. 204-219, july 2016. ISSN 1857-7725. Available at: <>. Date accessed: 07 may 2021.
English Articles