“On This Haunted Ground I Was Lost and Found“ – Echo’s Litography

  • Mirjana Stošić Singidunum University, Belgrade


Ovid’s work represents Echo in turning from bodily to bodiless shape, from the talkative voice to the surplus of voicelessness. Being punished to repeat the end of the sentences of the speaking-other, Echo is the ultimate figure of metamorphosis and of wandering – always lost in repetitions, always lost to be found in écriture in stone, in engraved narratives of the other, as a ghostly identity of the other. Therefore, Echo is a decentred, meandering voice – a voice only until there is any voice at all. Being the undercurrent of speech, Echo is a figure of fragmented, dismembered, detached speach, a travelling postcard on an errant, wandering course. The mythical Echo creates a sonorous ground to be written upon, only to be multiplied. Belonging to no-body, she is always on her way to die away and close, a voice-thing destabilizing the voice-subject. This research paper deals with the mythic figure of Echo in terms of Gayatri’s notion of „deconstructive embrace“ and the concept of the subaltern. Can Echo’s „fragile auricle“ be aligned to „non-mimetical“ identity, to multiplicities of repetitions in conflict to the voice-subject, the same and the different at once? Or, if Echo „has no identity proper to itself“, as Spivak puts it, what can be lost and found in echoland of identity, in the political space of „the catachresis of response as such“?


[1] Blanchot, Maurice. The Space of Literature. Lincoln, London: University of Nebraska Press, 1982.
[2] Braidotti, Rosi. Metamorphoses: towards a materialist theory of becoming. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2002.
[3] Buchanan, Ian, and Colebrook, Claire (eds.). Deleuze and Feminist Theory. Edinburgh University Press, 2000.
[4] Cixous, Hélène. “Coming to Writing” and Other Essays, Deborah Jensen (ed.). Cambridge, London: Harvard University Press, 1991.
[5] Derrida, Jacques. Rogues: Two Essays on Reason. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2005.
[6] Hollander, John. The Figure of Echo: Mode of Allusion in Milton and After. Berkeley, Los Angeles, London: University of California Press, 1984.
[7] Manchev, Boyan. “The New Arachne: towards a poetics of dynamic forms.” Performance Research: A Journal of the Performing Arts 20.1 (2015) : 18-26.
[8] Nancy, Jean-Luc. Listening. New York: Fordham University Press, 2007.
[9] Nouvet, Claire. “An Impossible Response: The Disaster of Narcissus”. Yale French Studies No. 79 (1991): 103-134.
[10] Ovid . Metamorphoses. Volume 1. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1984.
[11] P. Ovodii Nasonis. Metamorphoseon. Available at https://archive.org/stream/povidiinasonisme00ovid#page/n7/mode/1up.
[12] Spivak, Gayatri Chakravorty. “Echo (1993)”. In The Spivak Reader. Donna Landry and Gerald MacLean (eds.). New York & London: Routledge, 1996, 175-202.
How to Cite
STOŠIĆ, Mirjana. “On This Haunted Ground I Was Lost and Found“ – Echo’s Litography. Култура/Culture, [S.l.], v. 6, n. 13, p. 157-163, july 2016. ISSN 1857-7725. Available at: <http://journals.cultcenter.net/index.php/culture/article/view/253>. Date accessed: 07 may 2021.
English Articles